Thursday, December 10, 2009

Festive Reading


I've spotted a few different bloggers, and people in my reading groups, talking about the books they intend to read over Christmas - and quite often they're picking specifically seasonal titles. My friend Lyn reads A Christmas Carol every year, for example, and Claire at Paperback Reader has just put up some she intends to read (including Barbara Comyns' A Touch of Mistletoe, which may not have a very Christmassy theme, but certainly has a Christmassy title.) I'm feeling a little odd-one-out, now, since I never do seasonal reading. I read Tove Jansson's The Winter Book on a beach in summer (though admittedly it was windy and perishingly cold); I'm just as likely to read something set in sunny Spain by a fireside in December as I am in June. And I do feel I'm missing out, a bit... but somehow I don't plan my reading that well.

The one exception which springs to mind is Jostein Gaarder's The Christmas Mystery, a lovely book which has a chapter for each day of Advent - I read it in that style a few years ago.

How about you? Do you just read what comes your way, or do you plan books for seasons? Is it every season, or is Christmas special? The books I've set aside to read over the festive weeks (aside from ones for my research) are The Bell by Iris Murdoch, In the Springtime of the Year by Susan Hill (completely unseasonal, you see), Pastors and Masters by Ivy Compton-Burnett, and The Unspoken Truth by Angelica Garnett. Whether I'll actually get around to reading any of them is another question - others might force their way in, I like to keep my reading spontaneous when I can, since so much (for research and book groups) can't be.

I'd be interested to hear from you - especially if you have an unusual choice for this time of year...

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Won't somebody think about the children?

I left it a few days, to see what the final count would be, and Enid Blyton surges ahead of JK Rowling - last time I checked, it was 19 votes to 14, I think. That includes my vote, which went to Enid - without her, I'm not sure I'd be such a big fan of reading.


Congratulations, Ms. Blyton - and now I'm throwing the competition open. We've already had recommendations for E. Nesbit, and I'm keen to read more of her books, but now I'd like to know which children's books mean the most to you. Either growing up, or reading them to your own children and grandchildren. It would especially fun if they're a bit out of the ordinary. One I always remember is Albert the Dragon by Rosemary Weir, and its various sequels, illustrated by the always-delightful Quentin Blake. I don't know how old we were when this was read to us, but I've always remembered (in vague outline, of course) the friendship between Albert and the dragon. I suppose I should say I remember the feeling the books gave me, because in terms of plot I can only remember something vague about food turning into seaweed... Col? Mum? Dad? Am I remembering correctly?


A few years ago I bought one of the Albert books as a Mothering Sunday present for Mum (of course), and I wonder if it's still in the house... I might try and investigate when I go home for Christmas.

So, yes, favourite children's books, please, and why they mean so much to you...

Monday, December 7, 2009

Ladies in Lavender


I spent an enjoyable evening re-watching Ladies in Lavender, a 2004 film starring the indisputably wonderful Dames Judi Dench and Maggie Smith. I first watched this when it came out (of course I did, with those ladies at the helm) and I've watched it once or twice since, but never did it captivate me so wholly as tonight. And so I've been spurred on to write about it - encouraging you to watch or re-watch it.

The film, the directorial debut of Charles Dance, is based on a 1916 short story by William J. Loc
ke. The setting is moved to the mid-1930s, though, which gives the poignancy which is there in everything which takes place on the brink of war. Ladies in Lavender is set in Cornwall, and the ladies in question are elderly sisters - a widow and a spinster - living together quietly, affectionately, and uneventfully. Until one day, while checking the garden for storm damage, they spot a washed up body on the beach. Upon checking, it turns out that the body is alive - and is an unconscious Polish man, Andrea, who is later discovered to be a very talented violinist. The sisters Ursula (Dench) and Janet (Smith) nurse him back to health, and the film watches the repercussions on all of their lives - especially Ursula's.

Ladies in Lavender rests upon the extraordinary talents of Judi and Maggie, of course, and well they might. Ursula is a kind, naive, easily distressed old lady who has never experienced the peaks and troughs of life. Janet, a little more world-weary, cares intensely for her sister, but has a no-nonsense view on life. She tries to protect Ursula from getting too involved with Andrea's recovery, aware of the hurt she will suffer, but is helpless. I can't begin to describe how these women act as sublimely as they do - if you've seen them in anything, you'll know what I mean. The screenplay (also Dance's) is so subtle, so sparse - each scene is realised through the inflections in their voices, and their expressions, movements, touches. Alongside this pathos, comedy is provided by Miriam Margolyes as the sisters' cook Dorcas, who is as perfect as always at defusing well-mannered, softly-spoken scenes with lines in the vein of 'Nothing I haven't seen before'...


The term 'beautifully shot' always sounds pretentious, but I can think of no other for Ladies in Lavender. Even if the story weren't touching, the film would be worth watching on mute - some reviews seem to think this was overkill, but I don't think a film should avoid being beautiful. And this one really is beautiful - both in the dramatic views of the sea and scenery, and detailed domestic shots.

I should mention the other principal players, who are wonderful too - Daniel Bruhl spends quite a lot of the film without dialogue, since the character only gradually learns English, and so must put everything into his body language - and he does it brilliantly. Also, I don't know if he can play the violin well (it is actually played by Joshua Bell, who also released the soundtrack) but, if not, he acts it extremely convincingly (I was fooled, and I play the violin). And then there is Natascha McElhone, whom I have loved ever since The Truman Show.

This isn't the sort of film which proves very popular in the mainstream, and nor is it edgy or brittle enough to appeal to the indie market, so it probably isn't regarded as a classic in many circles. But I think it is the most subtle and beautiful of films, desperately and quietly moving, with extraordinary actors, making mild, everyday characters so important and vital. One I'll watch many times.

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Oh, Mr. Porter...


Rose Macaulay first hoved onto my horizons when I read Nicola Beauman's wonderful book
A Very Great Profession (which I discover, rather to my horror, I've never blogged about - it's essential reading for anyone remotely interested in Persephone books or any interwar domestic novels). On the strength of that, I bought Told By An Idiot in Pershore market, and... I still haven't read it. This is the story of so many of my books, of course, but Told By An Idiot (like, for some reason, Rosamund Lehmann's Dusty Answer) has been close to the top of the tbr pile on numerous occasions. It's come away on holiday with me, been placed by the bed, somehow never quite been read...

And I still haven't read it - but I have read a Rose Macaulay novel. While researching my middlebrow stuff,
Crewe Train by RM was mentioned a lot, especially in an interesting and newish book by Wendy Gan called Women, Privacy, and Modernity in Early Twentieth-Century British Writing. My curiosity piqued, I got hold of the novel and read it, and isn't it good? I don't know if I'm last to the party on Rose Macaulay. I had read some of her letters, but that was it, so forgive me if everyone else has read everything she ever wrote. Those whom I've asked seem to have been almost universally put off by The Towers of Trebizond...

Crewe Train (1926) takes its name from the popular rhyme:
Oh, Mr. Porter, whatever shall I do?
I want to go to Birmingham, but they've sent me on to Crewe!
and is about Denham, who has got onto the wrong path in life. Brought up by her clergyman father in Andorra, she has instincts and a lifestyle which are fairly primitive. Or so they seem when her father dies, and she must move to live with relatives in London, the Greshams, who live in high society and all write or publish or at least read books. That sort. In Denham's view:
Books were mostly dull enough, but criticisms of books were quite unreadable. The Greshams all read them, but then they appeared to be so constituted as to be able to read anything. It was nearly a disease with them.
Imagine! Denham is mystified by most of their activities, which seem to her to make no sense - the solemn dancing, the table manners, most of all the need to visit each other and hold conversation all the time. She is at a loss to either initiate or join the sorts of conversations that her relatives' circle expects of her - the only successful topic she lands upon is puddings - and she believes that people should stay in their own home, and not bother each other all the time.

But nothing is simple, of course, and Denham finds herself in love with (thankfully distant) relative Arnold - and they marry. The tidal wave of first love is enough to get them through a lot, but then the differences start to spring up. She is desperate not to live in London, and he can think of nowhere else to live. She never reads anything but maps, he writes stream-of-consciousness novels (one, Lone Jane, is a cruelly funny pastiche of Joyce et al, to which comes the response: "I suppose," said Denham doubtfully, "Jane did think like that. I suppose she was a little queer in the head.") Though never openly antagonistic, their marriage becomes a struggle - whose lifestyle and wishes will be sacrificed for the other, or will they reach an unhappy compromise?

If this sounds bleak, then it's only really bleak for the characters. The author and the reader are mostly having a whale of a time - Rose Macaulay has that affectionate, ironic voice which is so characteristic of the time, able to expose the ridiculous aspects of her characters without making them wholly ridiculous people. She uses the extremes of society to comment wryly on all of it, and uses Denham's unusual perspective on good manners and protocol for good comic effect. For example, when Denham's mother-in-law is instructing her on good house-management:

"It’s the only way of getting everything done in order. Monday morning clean the silver, Tuesday the knives, Wednesday, the paint, Thursday, the taps – and so on through the week. No day without something cleaned. And one room thoroughly turned out each day, too – that’s most important.”

“Turned out…” Denham repeated it vaguely.

“Yes, turned out. The things all taken out of the room and put back again, you know.”

What for, Denham silently wondered. The same result would surely be achieved, with less effort, by leaving the things where they were. But the maids would not then have done a morning’s work; that was of course important.

All in all, as well as being useful for my research, I found this a really fun novel, and I'll definitely be reading more. In fact, I like Keeping Up Appearances even more so far, it's very clever. If you haven't read any RM yet, do give Crewe Train a go. Of course, it's not in print... but there are plenty of 1p copies available on Amazon. And, who knows, Rose Macaulay might make a last minute addition to my Best Books of 2009, which I drafted the other day....

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Gloves on...

Time for another of our sporadic vote-offs, I think. In the past Jane Eyre has triumphed over Wuthering Heights; Music over Art; Hardy and Dickens came out equal, and... well, I can't remember the others. But it's been gripping.

Today we're taking a step into children's literature. I've noticed that whenever I mention Enid Blyton, I get lots of happy com
ments - she inspires that sort of nostalgic joy in a lot of us. When JK Rowling's name is heard, we reveal a slightly guiltier pleasure - perhaps because, for most of us, it's not a nostalgic issue, not yet.

But today they're going head to head - please cast your vote for your favoured author:
Enid Blyton vs. JK Rowling.


Of course you can also vote for 'neither of the above' if you're feeling very grown up... but I shan't settle for a 'both of 'em' answer - ladies and gentlemen, it's time to nail your colours to the mast!

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Bloomsbury

A couple Bloomsbury Group (Virginia et al, rather than Bloomsbury publishing) things to mention today - one being the CD I got from Our Vicar and Our Vicar's Wife for Christmas. I think it was my friend Lyn in Australia who first mentioned this to me - thus creating something of a circle, since the CD is released by the British Library. Click this link to buy it (no, no commission for me...) It's basically lots of clips of Bloomsbury Group people speaking, and those who knew them well. A lot come from a radio broadcast on Virginia Woolf, but it also has previously unreleased recordings, and is a great resource to have in one place. Entertaining and useful - and unique. I don't know about you, but I rarely have an author's voice in my head when I'm reading. I certainly wouldn't be able to read Mrs. Dalloway with Virginia Woolf's actual, very posh, tones pulsating through my mind - but, nevertheless, it is fascinating to hear what they sound like. Just hearing the voices is so interesting - for the most part, they are also talking about the Bloomsbury Group, which would be captivating in itself.

Some names for you - alongside Virginia, there is everyone you can think of. Here are just a few: Elizabeth Bowen, Vita Sackville-West, EM Forster, Frances Patridge, Leonard Woolf, Harold Nicolson, Bertrand Russell, Vanessa Bell, David Cecil, John Maynard Keynes, David Garnett, Duncan Grant, Clive Bell.... oh, everyone. And then you also get people like Nellie Boxhall and Grace Higgins, servants of people in the Bloomsbury Group - another fascinating angle. Let's just say that Nellie's voice would give a lot of people now considered 'posh' a run for their money.

One of the people featured whom I haven't mentioned is Angelica Garnett. I wrote a rather hazy review of Deceived with Kindness a while ago - in fact, it's on my 50 Books... list, though it's not my best review (and led to one of the funniest comments I've received - I usually don't publish the mean-spirited ones, but this one was too amusing to ignore). Having loved her autobiography, I was very keen to get hold of The Unspoken Truth, 'A Quartet of Bloomsbury Stories' which is coming out in January with Chatto & Windus. I sent them a begging letter, and it is now by my bed. Can't wait to read this lot - fictional, but apparently heavily based on fact. I must confess I didn't realise Angelica Garnett was still alive, so I was doubly excited - I'll let you know what I think around the publication date. But, always important, the cover is beautiful...

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Snaps from my holiday album

It's one of those unusual (possibly unique?) trips where I come back without having bought any books. Perhaps not entirely unexpected, since the 'Englisch' section of the one bookshop I entered was less than inspiring - but, even without buying books, I loved my trip to Switzerland!

Thank you for all your reading suggestions, which have been stored away in my mind (and, less vulnerably, my inbox) - it was especially lovely to hear from Lewerentz who is actually in Switzerland - and for Lewerentz's benefit, I will try to remember where we were in the country... quite near Schaffhausen... I can't remember the name of the village, but it was that part of the world.

Here are just a few snapshots of the trip...

The view from my bedroom window was rather beautiful.

Lots of beautiful chalet-style houses, but I don't seem to have taken photos of them - this one isn't wholly representative, but it is charming.


We spent a day at Rheinfall, Europe's something-ist waterfall. Widest? Biggest? Shiniest? It was a wet day in many senses.



The highlight of the trip was our day up a mountain, having snowball fights....



Amusingly, my trash talk (or, appositely, 'sledging') of "You'll be going all kinds of down!" was misheard as "You'll be wearing all kinds of denim!" Which, of course, became the catchphrase of the trip. Here Mel is about to be fitted for a new denim jacket, courtesy of Liz.


All in all, a fantastic holiday - and Switzerland is a rather wonderful country. Plus, all the residents have tasteful Christmas decorations. How do they do this? No inflatable nativity scenes in sight, nor even coloured light bulbs. Lovely. Oh, and we crossed the border into Germany to go to church - so that's another country I chalk up on my tiny list of countries visited.