Sunday, November 3, 2013

Plants vs. Zombies: Brains and the Beanstalk by Annie Auerbach - OPTIONAL

Auerbach, Annie  Plants vs. Zombies: Brains and the Beanstalk  Illustrated by Charles Grosvenor & Jeremy Roberts.  HarperFestival, 2013.  $4.99  PICTURE BOOK  Content: PG.  

Jack gets a note that zombies are coming to eat his and his mom’s brains.  His mom has Jack trade an old lawn mower so they can have some things to fight the zombies off with, but Jack trades the lawnmower for seeds.  This is the story of Jack and the Beanstalk mixed with the popular iPod app Plants vs. Zombies.  Jack uses the seeds and climbs the pea shooting vine.  He finds a gold marigold and a big zombie that wants to eat his brains, but Jack uses a red pepper that explodes the giant zombie off the vine and onto the other zombies in front of his house.  

This is obviously a book for those who play the game Plants vs. Zombies and is a bit confusing for the average person.  The red pepper must be an explosive from the game because I was unsure how it could blow up the big zombie.   It comes with 30 stickers. Overall, the pictures are bright and I think readers who like the game will like the book.  

EL (K-3)-OPTIONAL.  Reviewer, C. Peterson.

My Life in Books: Series Four: Day Seven

Erica, as well as running the blog Reading 1900-1945, has written a book about Elizabeth Taylor and Elizabeth von Arnim and is my frequent conference buddy!

Karen blogs at Kaggsy's Bookish Ramblings, and it was as 'Kaggsy' that I first met her (I believe) in a LibraryThing group which celebrates Virago Modern Classics.



Qu. 1.) Did you grow up in a book-loving household, and did your parents read to you? Pick a favourite book from your childhood, and tell me about it.

Erica: I did grow up in a book-loving household, and I think my parents must have read to me, but I don’t remember it! I think I must have learned to read at quite a young age; I can remember early on at primary school there being a book sale and being very excited about it. I chose a bumper Mr Man book that I think I still have somewhere with my name in the front and various scrawls.

I remember being a wide-ranging and omnivorous reader, and taking pride and comfort in my own bookcase filled with books in my bedroom, and finding various small spaces to become book-reading dens. I remember that I read Alice Adventures in Wonderland at the age of seven and became deeply attached to it despite not understanding most of it! What were these ‘conversations’ that Alice couldn’t find in her sister’s book? Not a clue. But, importantly, this didn’t seem to matter at all. So much of the pleasure of Alice is in the sounds of the words, and I think those that I didn’t understand were still enjoyable (and many of them are, of course, made up by Carroll). I find the conventional wisdom that children’s books must not contain vocabulary considered to be beyond the level of the readership rather frustrating. How else do you learn new words?

Through the Looking-Glass always had a different feeling to me than Alice; somehow it was more resonant, and more disturbing. I imagined myself going through the mist of the looking-glass into that world which seemed rather nightmarish to me.

KarenYes I did - both parents were always readers: my dad liked factual books (Chariots of the Gods and the like when I was growing up) plus thrillers and sci fi, whereas my mum reads more traditional 'women's books' (Santa Montefiore being her current favourite). They always read to me from an early age - in fact, my parents tell me that they thought I had learned to read particularly early as a young child, until they realised that I had simply memorised the stories and was reciting them back to people and pretending to read!

It's hard to pick out just one book that I loved from my childhood as I tended to read in series - Enid Blyton's Malory Towers, 'Mystery' and Five Find-Outers were particular favourites, and once I started to get pocket money, it would go on a new Enid every week. I was also keen on the Narnia books though I came to them a little later. Trying to pick out one, I keep oddly enough coming back to a book I kept getting out of our local library (and I can still visualise the inside of the building where I would get it checked out) - Dr. Seuss's I Had Trouble in Getting to Solla Sollew. It was the strange, surreal, alien imagery that appealed to me, so unlike my real life - I guess books have always been something of an escape for me!

Qu. 2.) What was one of the first 'grown-up' books that you really enjoyed? What was going on in your life at this point?

Erica: I continued to read books I didn’t understand - I remember my Mum not having any children’s books in the house when I was visiting one weekend (complicated family) and giving me Jane Austen’s Northanger Abbey. At the age of 10 or so I really couldn’t see what was funny about it! (But I soldiered on, as you do, and read all the works of Austen without understanding much by the age of 14.)

One of the first adult books I really enjoyed was Wuthering Heights, an A level set text. But unfortunately, and surprisingly given my current profession, I hated being made to analyse it - or ‘pick it apart’ as I considered it then. I wanted to be transported, to enjoy that narrative hypnosis which I thought was the point of novels. In retrospect this may be related to the fact my life was difficult at this point - more family breakdown - but I also suspect that 16 year old girls are suckers for a doomed love story and do not wish to made to relinquish that surrendered reading!

I did not do an English degree because I thought it would ruin reading for me!

Karen: Again, this is really hard to pick out just one, but I guess I would plump for The Hobbit. Some relatives heard that I loved the Narnia books (I would probably have been about 11 or so) and sent a copy of The Hobbit which both me and my dad devoured, and then followed up by raiding the library for the whole Lord of the Rings trilogy and reading the lot. After that I really never looked back - I borrowed my mum's romances (Victoria Holt, Mary Stewart etc al) and the Agatha Christies that were lying around the house, plus other crime authors like Ed McBain, and then followed this up by discovering Solzhenitsyn and the Russians when we studied the Russian Revolution at school. I was a fairly troubled teenager, as my favourite grandmother died when I was 11 and it took me a long time to deal with it - like I said, books were an escape, my coping mechanism.

Qu. 3.) Pick a favourite book that you read in your 20s or early 30s - especially if it's one which helped set you off in a certain direction in life.

Erica: Of all the books I read in my 20s, there is a clear winner for the one that changed my life. My post-degree working life was all about books, at different stages in their production. First I worked at Waterstone’s, then in marketing at a publisher, then in editorial. My work was pretty routine and unchallenging, and I was wondering what to do next when I saw an advert for a part-time MA called ‘Women, Gender and Writing’ at Roehampton University. I absolutely loved my MA. It was truly like a door opening. It showed me a way of thinking about books that stimulated and inspired me, and I felt that I had finally found my bookish world. After those years of resisting analysis I now loved thinking in a critical, informed way.

The book that changed my life was A Game of Hide and Seek by Elizabeth Taylor (1951). We had a seminar with the brilliant Nicola Humble who explained that this novel, and others like it were regarded as ‘middlebrow’ and as light, comforting reads for women, bless their feather-brained heads.

I couldn’t believe it. The novel I had read was funny, yes, but also incisive, acute and downright cruel in its dissection of the disappointments of life. A Game of Hide and Seek tells the story of Harriet and Vesey. As the novel begins they are eighteen and in love. At the end of the summer they will part, Harriet will marry someone else, and they will not enter each other’s lives again for another twenty years. Harriet and Vesey never protest and declare their love, yet it is omnipresent, and entirely credible. I thought it was one of the best novels I had ever read, and so well-written it almost hurt.

It formed part of my MA dissertation, which I called ‘The Reassurance of Cruelty’ - for the only reassurance I could see in it was that Taylor was saying yes, domestic life is as difficult and cruel as you thought. A reality is reflected back: yes, life is like that. A Game of Hide and Seek, my sense of outrage that it wasn’t recognised for the exceptional novel I considered it, and trying to understand why that was, started me on the road to an academic career.

Karen: Well, my early 20s were a pivotal time with my reading - this was when I discovered so many of the writers whose work I still love and return to. So that makes it really difficult to pick a favourite. But I think I will go for a slightly unlikely book, Literary Women by Ellen Moers. It was published by The Women's Press and I was a recent convert to feminism at the time, having recently discovered Virago too. Literary Women was a revelation, opening my eyes to an amazing amount of women writers I'd never heard of, let alone read. I finished up with a huge list of authors I wanted to discover which led me onto another pivotal book, Virginia Woolf's Mrs. Dalloway. I'd never read anything like it and it set me off on a whole new lifetime of reading, mainly because I was no longer intimidated by literature, and felt I could read anything I wanted to, from de Beavoir, Sartre, Camus et al to Italo Calvino (whose "If on a winter's night a traveler" almost got picked here as it caused me a major obsession with the author which still continues to this day!)

Qu. 4.) What's one of your favourite books that you've found in the last year or two, and how has blogging changed your reading habits?

Erica: I started blogging as part of my work on the collection of popular fiction published between 1900 and 1950 at Sheffield Hallam University. I don’t think I would have started a personal blog, but I’ve found I love being part of the conversation about books that happens in blogs.

Blogging has definitely changed my reading habits, because the reviews are of books in the collection. I very rarely find time to read books that fall outside this 1900-1950 time period. Now, hang on… this is just the same as when I was writing my PhD! I better face it. Contemporary fiction is a bit of a closed book to me. (Actually I did just read Jeanette Winterson’s The Daylight Gate (2013), borrowed from my Mum. It was HORRIBLE. I am mentally scarred. There was a clue in that it is publisher by Hammer, of Hammer horror fame, but I didn’t clock that….)

One of my favourite books of the last few years is Caitlin Moran’s How to Be a Woman (2011). I read it on a long train journey and I snorted and wept with laughter for several happy hours. So much of what she said resonated with me, and she said it all so well. A good rant is an underappreciated genre! And it is part of the splendid resurgence of feminism in recent years.

Karen: I've been blogging for a year now, and really enjoyed it - and probably discovered a lot books because of it! I enjoyed so much reading other blogs and the pleasure it gave me that I wanted to get involved and give something back. I really enjoy interacting with other bloggers and being part of a community, particularly as I don't actually know many people in real life that read the same sort of thing as I do! Blogging *has* changed my reading habits, for the better I think - I read more thoroughly and analytically now, and think much more about what I've read because I have to try and communicate what I feel about the book to any readers!

A favourite book? Again, it seems cruel to only pick one - but Bulgakov's The Master and Margarita stands out as having totally engrossed me and changed the way I look at things a lot - I see the absurd everywhere nowadays! But I think honourable mentions should go to the wonderful Persephone Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day which I couldn't put down and had me grinning from ear to ear; and Miss Hargreaves, which I heard about from your blog and really must read again!


Qu. 5.) Finally - a guilty pleasure, or a favourite that might surprise people!

Erica: My not-guilty-at-all pleasure is to read Buffy the Vampire Slayer comics. For my birthday and at Christmas my Dad is instructed to buy me the latest volume - for my birthday just gone it was Series 9, volume 2 - thank you Dad! I love the humour, insight and feminist sensibility of Buffy, and the visual experience of reading a comic, probably because it is so different from what I usually read. I also think it is important to have some reading for which you will NEVER take notes. I guess it is back to the ‘surrendered reading’ of my childhood.

Karen: Cookbooks! I have a weakness for reading them and have three shelves in my kitchen.... It probably stems from when I went vegetarian when I was 18 and had to read up on it a bit - this was a *loooong* time ago without all the veggie conveniences we have now. Some of my oldest are from the 1970s and though I probably wouldn't cook much from the older books, they read almost like a kind of social history - it's amazing how our culinary habits have changed!!

And... I've told you the other person's choices, anonymously. What do you think these choices say about their reader?

Karen, on Erica's choices: Well, the first thing that springs to mind here is that this person obviously likes reading about feisty heroines - starting with Alice and ending with Buffy, both of whom are strong and individual, though in different ways. Alice is contrary from the point she runs off after the White Rabbit to her defiance of the Court and is definitely a good role model for young people! And Buffy is a character who takes no nonsense either.

This reader also seems to have a taste for the dramatic and passionate, as Wuthering Heights is certainly that, and also features another feisty woman in the form of Cathy, refusing to let death get in the way of her love. Although A Game of Hide and Seek might seem like a quieter proposition, it also features a heroine who marries for money, not love, but never stops caring for the man in her heart, so both of these books show a reader who likes to examine the motivations of people's passions.

As for Caitlin Moran - well, there's another feisty one! She's pithy and funny and so although this reader isn't necessarily female (plenty of men I know like spiky, in control females!), he/she certainly has a fondness for dominant women - I could foresee interesting time spent in their company discussing books!



Erica on Karen's choices: Oh, I might know who this is! Is it Karen, from Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings? It is the Bulgakov that makes me think this, but then by Googling I have just found out that there is a whole website devoted to The Master and Margarita alone, so there are many fans out there. This person sounds very well-rounded, with tastes that range from Dr Seuss (who I love too – his Sleep Book was a favourite as a child) through to Tolkein (who I think of as peculiarly male – is it the questing?) to Literary Women and cookery books. There’s a strong thread of fantasy (and in The Master and Margarita it sounds a very dark fantasy), and then the cookery books bring this reader back into the material world. I had to look up Ellen Moers’ book as I’m ashamed to say I have not read this ground-breaking book – I will be looking it up in the library. I too like reading cookery books for relaxation – and for planning all the lovely things I am going to cook and eat, of course!

Saturday, November 2, 2013

My Life in Books: Series Four: Day Six

Alex blogs at Alex in Leeds and recently made storms in the blogosphere with her ingenious idea of the book jar.

Liz blogs in two places!  Her book blog can be found at Libro Full Time, while her work blog is at Libro Editing.



Qu. 1.) Did you grow up in a book-loving household, and did your parents read to you? Pick a favourite book from your childhood, and tell me about it.

 Alex: My parents both read but I remember being rather embarrassed by their book choices – mostly Dick Francis and Danielle Steele. I was a voracious reader and wanted to know about everything from medieval churches to dinosaurs to how computers work so my mother signed me up to the library very early on, something I am very, very grateful for. Having access to the library gave me the freedom to explore without worrying about how much all these books actually cost or how long my enthusiasm for steam trains would last. It’s down to those six orange cardboard tickets (and some wonderful librarians) that I am the reader I am today!

My happiest memory of that first library is spending hours sitting cross-legged in the corner of the children’s section reading all of Andrew Lang’s Fairy Books. Each volume is a different colour – Green, Blue, Crimson etc – and the editions I read were illustrated. I didn’t know they were classics but nearly all the stories were brand new to me and I was spell-bound.

Liz: I did grow up in a book-loving household, with books all over the place, books the main thing I bought with my own money, and books bought for me. I was read to, and I remember the excitement of going through Arthur Ransome's We Didn't Mean to go to Sea with my Dad. As for a favourite childhood book, this is a bit difficult, because I'm a great one for re-reading childhood favourites, so it's hard to differentiate between my favourite books then and now. I loved the E. Nesbit books, and the Noel Streatfeilds, and had a huge passion for pony books. I would guess that maybe The Secret Garden is the book I remember loving as a child and still loving now.



Qu. 2.) What was one of the first 'grown-up' books that you really enjoyed? What was going on in your life at this point?

Alex: I, Claudius by Robert Graves when I was about 12 or 13. I was far too young to be reading it but I was going through a phase of being fascinated by the Romans. My parents had split up earlier that year and I was looking for escapism. It’s such an outrageous book in so many ways, scandal on every page, very confessional in style and not at all what I thought it would be when I picked it up. It was the perfect book for taking to the park that summer and getting lost in.

Liz: I read The Hobbit aged 7, because I was a precocious and advanced reader, but I recall not really getting much out of it. May I skip forward to the age of 14, when I was introduced to a whole slew of new authors by a dear neighbour, who was an outpost of socialist feminism in a sea of Tory reactionary village life? She got me into Virago books, Barbara Pym, Barbara Comyns, and especially Iris Murdoch. Although I was working my way around the adult section of our TINY village library by then, doing Agatha Christie and Patrick Moore's sci fi and the James Bond and Georgette Heyer books from my school library, when I read Murdoch's A Severed Head in my mid-teens, I remember feeling VERY grown-up and sophisticated, even though, as a rather sheltered only child attending a girls' Grammar School, I have no idea what I would have actually made of it and whether I'd have understood much of it!

Qu. 3.) Pick a favourite book that you read in your 20s or early 30s - especially if it's one which helped set you off in a certain direction in life.

Alex: It has to be Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales. I had a modern English version that I’d enjoyed reading in my teens but I fell in love when I read it in the original Middle English in my early twenties.

The tales crackle with sarcasm and subversion to the point where Terry Jones has even made a case in Who Murdered Chaucer? for the poet’s mysterious disappearance in 1400 (no grave, no official mention of his death, no family story about it) being down to his dangerous use of commoners’ English instead of courtly French and critical portrayal of religious characters like the nun and the pardoner. The tales are vibrant, earthy and foreign and they’re great fun to read aloud. They also switched my interests from formal monarchy-led history to social history. I now have a bookcase entirely filled with non-fiction history books but very few of them are about kings or queens and that’s largely down to Chaucer!

Liz: I discovered a good set of writers in my 20s and 30s - Larry McMurtry, Anne Tyler, Jill McCorkle, Douglas Coupland, and got into a great habit of picking up every new book they wrote, which has seen me through.  I especially like Anne Tyler's A Slipping-Down Life. I suspect that reading A Suitable Boy by Vikram Seth when it came out in the single-volume paperback, which must have been in about 1997 when I was 25, sealed my love of books set on the Indian sub-continent.

Qu. 4.) What's one of your favourite books that you've found in the last year or two, and how has blogging changed your reading habits?

Alex: I came to book blogging nine years ago because my personal blog was being overtaken by bookish thoughts. Book blogging in 2004 was an odd thing to be doing and the few of us that were doing it were truly isolated. Watching a book blogging ‘community’ form and then fragment over the years has been fascinating and being part of it has definitely affected my reading. Without book blogging I suspect I’d have lost my childhood enthusiasm for diverse reading and the happy confidence to try just about anything. Without my favourite bloggers’ recommendations I would have missed so many quirky, niche or older books and my reading life would have been much poorer for it.

2012 was a great reading year for me but The Master and Margarita by Mikhail Bulgakov was my favourite book by far. I’d read it in my teens but got much more out of the re-read. It breaks so many literary rules – the main characters don’t show up till halfway through the book, the heroes aren’t actually good people, it’s crazy and cruel... yet it is funny and provocative and just about perfect.

Liz: A favourite author I have discovered in the last few years is Dorothy Whipple, via, of course, the Persephone books imprint. I can't pick a favourite, but knowing I have Persephone in general and Whipple in particular in my life gives me great joy and comfort.

How did I come to blogging? Well, I've been keeping a reading journal in notebooks since 1997, and in August 2005, I decided to put my book reviews onto my new LiveJournal blog - I didn't really want to blog just about my personal life, and I liked sharing my book reviews. I started my second Wordpress blog in November 2011 in order to record my transfer from employment to full-time self-employment, and my book reviews snuck onto there as I transformed it into a blog about my life as a self-employed person, including having time to read (at last, after a couple of sticky years where my reading totals went WAY down). Reading is one of my comforts and keeps me sane, and it was important to me to build that up again, and I started putting my book reviews on this blog, finally bringing my LJ archive through earlier this year.

Blogging hasn't changed my reading habits, but book review blogging has changed my book review blogging habits (still with me?) as I discovered a few months ago that I was dissatisfied with my short reviews, and decided to review two books at a time in a longer review format, rather than three or four snapshots. I've really enjoyed doing this, and my readers have appreciated the new format, too. Amusingly, I thought that blogging about and posting a picture of my current State of the TBR every month, and confessing when I bought new books, would rein my book buying habits in a bit. Nope!


Qu. 5.) Finally - a guilty pleasure, or a favourite that might surprise people!

Alex: I don’t really have guilty pleasures! I’m going to pick No Logo by Naomi Klein. Published in 1999 it details how much power the major brands have – in sweat shops and McJobs, in media and lobbying various governments. It quickly became the bible of the culture jamming and anti-globalisation movements and remains one of my favourite social history/political books. I think it’s also one of the first non-IT books I read that cited websites. I don’t often write about my politics so perhaps the fact that I strongly believe in actively avoiding multinational companies and supporting local ones instead, am about to give up my TV for good and have NEVER eaten anything from a McDonalds will surprise people.

Liz: I surprised someone just the other day by having a Jilly Cooper book or two on the bookshelf. Not a guilty pleasure - I like a well-written (and that's the key - Cooper has awful puns but writes well, Binchy and Keyes catch the nuances of Irish English beautifully) lighter novel, so Cooper, Maeve Binchy (A Scarlet Feather) and Marian Keyes have a happy place on my bookshelves among the Murdochs and Viragoes. I do like a cosy mystery, too, preferably set in the world of quilting or knitting. I don't count these as a guilty pleasure, either, as they still rank higher than a trashy mag or rubbishy TV programme in my estimation! Another massive passion which many people don't know about is for mountaineering, sailing and Polar exploration books - such as Tim Moore's Frost on my Moustache - I am not known for my physical prowess or for venturing far from home, but these are a love that has sustained me from late childhood onwards.

And... I've told you the other person's choices, anonymously. What do you think these choices say about their reader?

Liz on Alex's choices: A fairly serious person with an interest in myth and legend, who possibly had a humanities-based education and has been influenced politically by their reading. They like to keep up to date with current themes in sociology and politics and read books for their basic interest rather than trendiness. They're well-read, fairly serious, and have fairly intellectual pursuits.

Alex, on Liz's choices: Wow, what an eclectic mix. Let me see, we have a 1911 children's classic, a 1961 tale of adultery, incest and the sexual revolution and a 1993 monster of a novel (nearly 1500 pages!) about India's independence and partitioning. Speculating wildly I'd say that was someone who grew up with access to conventionally 'safe' books for children with the Hodgson Burnett but quickly developed a taste for pushing their reading boundaries. From picking up books with very risque themes in their early teens to tackling huge tomes to enjoying discovering lost gems like Dorothy Whipple through small printing presses like Persephone Books, this is someone who likes to feel like a literary adventurer when they step into a library or a bookshop. I bet they're good at finding quirky titles others miss. I'm not at all surprised to see mountaineering and polar exploration books as their guilty pleasure though since it seems an obvious escalation of their interest in discovery and pioneers! I'd actually love to spend some time perusing this reader's shelves, I think I'd find a lot to challenge and delight me there.

Friday, November 1, 2013

The Smurfs: Scaredy Smurf Makes a Friend by Peyo - OPTIONAL

 Peyo The Smurfs: Scaredy Smurf Makes a Friend Simon Spotlight, 2013.  $16.99  EARLY READER Content: G.  

Scaredy Smurf is afraid to do everything his friends do-swimming, hiking, etc.  The other Smurfs like to make fun of Scaredy Smurf because he is always so sacred.  Scaredy Smurf gets tired of being made fun of and decides to go home.  When he walks into his house there is a huge spider sitting in the middle of his floor.  He jumps onto his table and the spider hides under the dresser, and when Scaredy Smurf realizes that she is scared too they become friends.  When Scaredy Smurf takes the spider for a walk all the other Smurfs are scared, so Scaredy Smurf lets the spider go into the woods.  Papa Smurf points out to the Smurfs that sometimes people are scared of different things and we should not make fun of each other.  

This book has a good message about not making fun of other’s fears.  The illustrations are basic and not real great, but kids who like the Smurfs will like the cute story and it has a good message.  There are around four sentences of text per page.  

EL (K-3)-OPTIONAL.  Reviewer, C. Peterson.

Don't You Wish by Roxanne St. Claire - OPTIONAL

St. Claire, Roxanne  Don’t You Wish, 360 pgs.  Delacorte Press, 2012.  $17.99  Content: Language (101 swears); Mature Content: R (lots of sex talk; drug use); Violence: PG.  

Annie Nutter finds out that the man her mother dated before her father is filthy rich, and while wishing that she lived a more glamorous life she is zapped into another dimension.  In this new dimension she is dropped into the middle of Ayla’s life, a girl who is beautiful and popular.  Ayla has Annie’s mother and the ex-boyfriend as her parents and they may have a lot of money, but Annie quickly learns that money can’t buy happiness.  Ayla does illegal things to maintain her position as queen bee as well as promise her virginity to keep the most popular boy, Annie is not willing to do either of these things and quickly finds herself friends with a cute social outcast named, Charlie.  Ayla’s life may look great from the outside, but as Annie lives inside Ayla’s life, she is willing to trade anything to get back to her old boring life, where she now realizes she was happy.  The hardest part of going back to her old life would be leaving Charlie behind.  

This book has a good message about being happy with our lives and not wishing to be anyone else.  The romance between Annie and Charlie is sweet.  I had issues with all of the talk of sex, the drug use and stealing.  

HS-OPTIONAL.  Reviewer, C. Peterson.

The Weight of Water by Sarah Crossen - ADVISABLE


Crossan, Sarah The Weight of Water, 210 pgs. 2012. Bloomsbury Children’s Books; $16.99.  Language: PG; (2 swears 0 Fs) Violence: PG; Mature Content: PG.  

12-year-old Kasienka and her mother have emigrated from Poland to Coventry, England.   Now, Kasienka is an outcast at school; an outsider subject to bullying and prejudice, she desperately wants to return to Poland, but Mama came to search for Tata who abandoned the family, so going back is not an option.  

Written in verse, Crossan examines the plight of the immigrant, bullying, and family relationships.  A bit too mature for elementary, girls would enjoy this quick middle school read.  MS ADVISABLE Lisa Librarian

My Life in Books: Series Four: Day Five


Simon is... me!  I wasn't sure if I'd ever participate in My Life in Books myself, but I couldn't resist this year... I felt a bit bad, because there are still plenty of other wonderful bloggers to take part, but... well, I couldn't resist!

Christine blogs at The Book Trunk, a site (and I quote) 'dedicated to my grandmother, who ran away from her Norwegian home in 1915 and arrived in England with nothing but a trunk full of books.'



Qu. 1.) Did you grow up in a book-loving household, and did your parents read to you? Pick a favourite book from your childhood, and tell me about it.

Simon: As you will already have gathered in a previous series from Colin's answer, our house was indeed rather filled with books - and this in an area where owning books at all was rather unusual - but Mum and Dad always encouraged us to go to the library, rather than buying books. That's a life lesson which has, obviously, been taken to heart... ahem!

I imagine both my parents read to us, but I particularly remember Mum doing so - and having to stop reading The Magician's Nephew by C.S. Lewis because we found it too distressing, although we loved hearing the rest of the Narnia books. Actually, that reminds me of a time Dad did read to us - when he read Mr. Mischief by Roger Hargreaves to us at his sister's house, and we both cried at his misdeeds. Something about destroying a cake, perhaps. (I'm sure Dad also read to us without us crying!)

But, after that build-up, I couldn't really pick any author other than Enid Blyton for this first answer. The first book I read by myself (for which read: I read one page, Mum read three) was a Famous Five book, and I got hooked on Enid Blyton for the next five or six years, reading very little else. Amongst my favourites, and starting a passion for twin-books which persists today, was the St. Clare's series, starting (I believe) with Twins at St. Clare's. I don't know how well it would stand up to an adult's eyes, and it's probably full of hideous morals about stiff upper lips, but I relished it (and never got on with Malory Towers, incidentally.)

Christine: I was incredibly lucky growing up in a bookish household and books have been a huge part of my life from the time I was really small – when I was a baby and wouldn’t sleep my mother held me and read aloud from whatever she was reading at the time! My parents were both great readers so the house was always full of books, and they would talk about what they had read. They encouraged my brother and I to do the same, and they never stopped us reading anything, however unsuitable it may have seemed. When we were very young they read us stories (not just at bedtime, but at other times of the day as well), and told tales ‘out of their heads’, which we loved. We read everywhere, even at mealtimes – I was amazed to discover other families viewed this as bad manners! And we took books on holiday, and acquired more while we were away, instead of souvenirs (a habit I’ve never lost).

I’ve got so many childhood favourites. There was Adventures of Mr Pip about a strange goblinish little man, who loved the colour red, and was always getting into trouble, and The Secret Garden and the Just So Stories, as well as lots of Noel Streatfeild and Edith Nesbit, and Masefield’s The Midnight Folk, and Milly Molly Mandy and too many others to mention.

However, standing out above everything else is my copy of AA Milne’s When We Were Very Young, bought when I was less than a year old, with an inscription at the front written by my father. It’s this book, more than any other, which made me aware of the magic of words and the way they are used, and the rhythms of speech, and how you can read something and imagine what happens next. Reciting the rhymes became a family ritual (repeated, years later, with my own daughters). For rice pudding days there was, of course, 'Rice Pudding'. On trips to London we chanted 'Buckingham Palace', and 'Lines and Squares'. Illness required 'The Dormouse and the Doctor', while the opening of a new jar of marmalade called for 'The King’s Breakfast'.  My daughters always loved this book as well, and I still adore it as much as ever I did – more so, perhaps, because it conjures up such happy memories.


Qu. 2.) What was one of the first 'grown-up' books that you really enjoyed? What was going on in your life at this point?

Simon: I'm lucky that there has never been a stage in my life when I didn't love reading, once I'd started, but I clung on to pretty poor teen and pre-teen books for rather too long. It was wise of my parents to let me read what I wanted, so that reading didn't become a chore. But the move from Sweet Valley High (TWINS!) was bound to come and, although I can't remember what drew me to it, George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four was probably the first Grown-Up book I read - except for that gateway drug Agatha Christie.

Nervously, I re-read Nineteen Eighty-Four a couple of years ago, to see if it was still as brilliant as I thought it was when I was about 14. And, oh, it is. Yes, there is the political satire (or warning), and its dystopian overtones are probably what has secured its literary significance, but for me it is chiefly fascinating for character. Winston Smith is the true everyman, with the hopes and weaknesses and unexpected courage that so many people possess. In impossible circumstances, he is neither an unrealistic hero nor a passive victim, but somehow both. I don't know how much of Orwell's talent I understood at 14, but it took me away from the enjoyable rubbish that (in turn) had put me on the path of loving reading.

Christine: I can remember reading Oliver Twist, and crying for days when Nancy was murdered. And Jane Eyre is my ‘must have’ book’ but I have no idea when I first read it. So I’ve plumped for Muriel Spark’s The Ballad of Peckham Rye, which I read when I was at grammar school. It was most definitely not on the curriculum there – I bought it at the local bookshop, attracted by the title and the cover on the 1966 Penguin edition, which shows a photograph of a man wearing a smiling devil's mask, complete with horns, as he peers over the shoulder of a marble angel. It was one of the first contemporary novels I encountered (until then most of my reading was classics based). Written by a modern woman, it opened up a whole new world in my reading life. I loved the spare quality of the writing, the wry humour, the subversive feel of the book, and the fact that there were no heroes and heroines in the conventional sense, just ordinary men and women going about their everyday lives, completely unprepared for the advent of Dougal Douglas and the chaos and confusion he trails behind him.

And Spark blends reality and fantasy so skilfully that you never know what is real and what is not, or whether the whole thing is an illusion. Before that I’d never considered the nature of truth and fiction. I’d read books set in magical worlds, and others that were firmly rooted in the real world, but this novel broke down barriers and genres and mixed things up in a totally unexpected way, and made me think about how it was written, as well as the story.

School was very conventional, very middle-class, with great emphasis on working towards exams and taking part in sports, and I felt very much a ‘number’, rather than an individual. Finding this book helped me realise that I was still a person in my own right, and could make my own choices about things I liked, and it didn’t matter if other people didn’t approve or didn’t enjoy the same things.


Qu. 3.) Pick a favourite book that you read in your 20s or early 30s - especially if it's one which helped set you off in a certain direction in life.

Simon: How tempting it was to write about Miss Hargreaves here! But I knew that would give me away in an instant, and instead I focused on the part about 'setting me off in a certain direction'. Since I have yet to set off in any permanent direction, I will have to consider one of the books which led to me choosing to study English Literature at university. Truth be told, I never considered anything else for long (except for a brief dalliance with English and History) and I can't imagine studying anything else - but reading Virginia Woolf still changed things for me. It was after having seen the film The Hours that I wanted to see what it was based on, and the woman whose children I babysat lent me Mrs. Dalloway when I was 17. How strange to think it was only three years since I'd started thinking about adult fiction at all!

Looking back, I'm surprised that a 17 year old engaged with Virginia Woolf's writing, but I must have been either precocious or ahead of my time, because I absolutely loved it. By this age there were plenty of novelists I'd grown to love, but I didn't realise any author could use language so perfectly, or craft such beautiful, thoughtful novels. And analysable ones, too! I realised that Proper Literature could be as fun and lovely to read as anything else, and that I would love to write essays about this sort of thing. I'd found my period, definitely, and ten years later I'm still at university, still writing about Virginia Woolf (admittedly she only gets a paragraph or two in my thesis - but she's still there!)

Christine: I did a lot of re-reading, rather than trying anything new. I think I was seeking comfort and reassurance. I’d moved to the Midlands and was desperately home-sick, not just for my family, but for the sound of a southern accent and the sight of a London bus! One of my few discoveries was Margaret Atwood: I was knocked out by Lady Oracle, The Edible Woman and Cat’s Eye. Again, it’s that blend of fantasy and reality which I find so appealing, and the fact that these women are all searching for an identity and a way to express themselves.

But, since I stuck to old favourites then, my choice has to be Jane Eyre, by Charlotte Bronte, which I return to time and time again. It’s seen me through good times and bad, and whenever I read it I am just as enthralled. I love everything about it, especially the way Jane is so quiet and unassuming, but knows her own mind, and has the courage to stand by her convictions, whatever the cost to her own happiness or that of others.

And I am such a sucker for a happy ending! Forget the rest of the final chapter, just read the opening sentence: “Reader, I married him.” That’s all I ever want to know. It’s such a satisfactory conclusion, although I have to admit my view of Mr Rochester has changed over the years, and I no longer see him as an alluring romantic hero. He’s not very nice at all (and that’s putting it politely). He married his first wife for her fortune, hid her in the attic when she became ill, ran away to Europe, kept mistresses, then tried to marry Jane, who had no friends or family to protect her. And what about that chapter where he dresses as a gipsy woman and tells fortunes for his guests? There’s an element of real cruelty there I think as he toys with them all, like a cat playing with a mouse.

But I don’t care! I love him, and I love Jane, and I want them to live happily ever after.


Qu. 4.) What's one of your favourite books that you've found in the last year or two, and how has blogging changed your reading habits?

Simon: Usually I'm asking people from other blogs to share their blog story; perhaps, since you're already reading Stuck-in-a-Book, you know the story. But I'll recap - I started blogging in 2007 as a distraction to my final undergraduate exams, since I already knew various people who'd taken up blogging from an online book discussion list I was on.

Although I've been a bit intractable with my reading, more often buying the books that other bloggers recommend than actually reading them, there has (of course) still been quite a number of fantastic books I've read as the direct or indirect result of blogging. But the author I'm going to pick is one I'd read before started blogging, but to whom I have the blogosphere to thank for re-introducing me. And it's Muriel Spark. I'd read, and been pretty indifferent to, The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie and The Girls of Slender Means, but enthusiastic reviews from Simon, Polly, and Claire (I think) led me to pick up another Muriel Spark - The Driver's Seat - and I was hooked.

I've since read another eight or nine, and even co-run a delightfully successful Muriel Spark Reading Week across the blogosphere. The one I'll pick here, which was the fourth one I read overall, is Loitering With Intent, a madcap tale of a memoir club, corrupt publishers, and fanciful heroine cheerfully confusing everyone. It's quintessential Spark, and the blogosphere is to thank for making Muriel one of my favourite authors.

Christine: Ask me the same question on a different day and I’ll probably give you a different answer. Today I’ll say Miss Hargreaves, by Frank Baker – one of Simon’s recommendations. And no, I’m not currying favour, but this was so wacky, and so funny, and slightly disturbing at the same time, and I really, really enjoyed reading it.

I wouldn’t have picked it up before I started blogging, but I’ve been a little more adventurous recently. I’ve read and fallen in love with Virginia Woolf, Sylvia Townsend Warner, and other authors from the first half of the 20th Century, and I’ve ventured into the realms of non-fiction with Kathleen Jamie and Robert MacFarlane. Additionally, I set myself an annual challenge - 2012 was the Year of the Essay, this year I’m exploring short stories, and next year I want to discover some foreign authors. But I still love my 19th Century classics, and I still hate gory crime thrillers and dystopian futuristic novels!

My younger daughter persuaded me to write a blog because I was so downcast after being made redundant. To start with I wrote about anything that caught my interest. Gradually books took over, and I started following other people because I like to see their views on what they’ve read, but I don’t post as regularly as I should.


Qu. 5.) Finally - a guilty pleasure, or a favourite that might surprise people!

Simon: My tastes tend to stick with fiction, or non-fiction about fiction (author biographies etc.), but I do have a rather unexpected love for books about psychology and neurology. Perhaps it is truer to say that I love books by Oliver Sacks. I know very little about science, and other authors I've tried on these topics haven't captivated me at all, but Sacks's A Man Who Mistook His Wife For A Hat and Hallucinations are primarily exercises in storytelling. The human mind is, of course, limitlessly fascinating - and I am usually fascinated by it when it is shown through fiction, and the way characters behave - but Sacks makes the most inaccessible of topics utterly accessible for the layman, and writes so compassionately and engagingly that anybody would be swept away.

Christine: Difficult! My reading matter is very predictable, and I don’t think one should ever feel guilty about books. However, I do sometimes feel slightly uneasy when I’m caught reading children’s literature! Judging by people’s reaction this is not considered normal behaviour for a supposedly sensible adult. All I can say is, it should be. Perhaps it counts as a guilty pleasure? What do other people think? Anyway, I have a real weakness for children’s books, even picture books, like Winnie the Witch. I still read them, I still buy them, and a friend’s young children keep me up to date with modern authors and swap favourites with me. For a really joyous, life affirming story I’d opt for The Secret Garden, by Frances Hodgson Burnett, which will get you some very odd looks indeed if you read it on a train, as I once did. So perhaps it is a passion best indulged in private!

And... I've told you the other person's choices, anonymously. What do you think these choices say about their reader?

Christine, on Simon's choices: Oh dear, this is the bit I’m no good at! Those are interesting choices – curious that we both selected Muriel Spark, and I very nearly plumped for Mrs Dalloway instead of Miss Hargreaves, so it would seem to be someone with similar tastes, who likes understated writing and authors with a darkly comic edge. Then there’s Nineteen Eight-Four, which is much too bleak for me, but Orwell is another author who produces pared back prose with never a word out of place. So this is someone who is attracted by well written prose, rather than a rattling good story, and the inclusion of the Oliver Sacks’ book would seem to indicate someone with an interest in psychology perhaps… I think it’s someone who’s much better grounded in reality than I am and, perhaps, someone who has studied English. Now let’s see how wrong I am!

Simon on Christine's choices: Of course I'm cheating a bit, since I know Christine's identity, but I will do my best to say what I would have said about Christine's choices.  And what kindred spirits we are!  I should do these in order, but I have to talk about Miss Hargreaves first - anybody who chooses Baker's novel is already a dear friend of mine.  In fact, Miss HargreavesWhen We Were Very Young, The Ballad of Peckham Rye, and The Secret Garden (as well as all being books I love) speak of a reader who loves life to have a bit of fantasy and whimsy, but still has strong emotional responses alongside.  I see a delightful, slightly wry, sense of humour yet firm belief in kindness to others in this reader.  There's an element of fantasy in Jane Eyre too, of course, but it's a curve ball for me - because (to my mind) it lacks the humour of the others, and is perhaps more a case of nostalgic reading; so, someone who allows themself to look back fondly to the past now and again.